Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2018

Fast Forward: When To Seek Early Resolution Of Issues In International Commercial Arbitrations

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

They have been developing their arbitration rules to reflect the complexities of large scale, document intensive matters.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Issue

Arbitral institutional rules have been developing in a way to encourage parties to deal with substantive issues on a preliminary basis. They have been developing their arbitration rules to reflect the complexities of large scale, document intensive matters. 

Traditionally, when thinking about the advantages of arbitration compared to litigation, proponents of arbitration refer to the cost, speed and flexibility that arbitration affords parties However, in the midst of arbitral proceedings, parties may find that these benefits are lost as a result of extensive documentary and witness/expert evidence which, perhaps more often than not, can characterize commercial disputes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from