Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2026

Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards In Ontario When Public Policy Is Put To The Test

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

International arbitration is premised on a simple but powerful idea: parties who agree to arbitrate their disputes should be able to rely on the outcome and enforce the decision without opening the door...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

International arbitration is premised on a simple but powerful idea: parties who agree to arbitrate their disputes should be able to rely on the outcome and enforce the decision without opening the door to the outcome being revisited. Canadian courts have long embraced this principle, and a recent Ontario Superior Court decision offers a clear illustration of how firm that commitment is.

Feicheng Mining Group v. Liu arose from a familiar cross‑border dispute: a foreign award, a Canadian respondent, and a final attempt to resist local enforcement. What followed was a disciplined application of the principles of international arbitration and a clear confirmation that enforcement proceedings carry a narrow mandate.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from