Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MARCH 2026

Private Damages Activity Continues To Escalate Across Key Jurisdictions

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

Across key jurisdictions, the "gatekeeping" phase in collective redress—whether certification or collective authorization—continues to define who gets into court and on what terms...

GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law

Across key jurisdictions, the "gatekeeping" phase in collective redress—whether certification or collective authorization—continues to define who gets into court and on what terms, with materially different thresholds shaping claimant leverage.

Access to collective redress: divergent gatekeeping standards

U.S. courts have reinforced that a lack of commonality and predominance of an issue between class members can be a major barrier to class certification. In both In re Keurig Green Mountain Single Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig. and Miami Products & Chemical Co. v. Olin Corp., federal courts in New York held that a record showing that plaintiffs and defendants engaged in individual price negotiations meant that individual issues predominated over common ones for the proposed class.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from