Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2026

GT Newsletter | Competition Currents | April 2026

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

Competition authorities worldwide are intensifying enforcement across multiple sectors, from healthcare and renewable energy to automotive and technology. How are regulatory agencies coordinating—or diverging—in their approaches to merger review, algorithmic pricing, and cross-border transactions, and what does this mean for companies navigating an increasingly fragmented global enforcement landscape?

GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law

United States

A. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

1. FTC Chairman commits to pursuing merger challenges exclusively in federal court.

During a Feb. 20, 2026, speech, FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson expressed a preference to challenge mergers in federal court at the outset, rather than using the agency’s internal adjudication process, where cases are decided by an administrative law judge, then appealed to the FTC Commissioners, and then appealed to a federal court. Ferguson stated the change would align FTC and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) legal standards and reduce the risk of constitutional challenges to the agency’s internal adjudication process. Ferguson further noted that this approach would increase credibility in the FTC’s enforcement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from