Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2014

New Developments For Real Property Transactions

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On July 9, 2014, the German Supreme Fiscal Court decided a real estate transfer tax ("RETT") case that shines a new light on RETT structures.

GermanyTax

On July 9, 2014, the German Supreme Fiscal Court decided a real estate transfer tax ("RETT") case that shines a new light on RETT structures. Contrary to the long-standing interpretation of the law, the court took the position that aspects of economic ownership are also relevant for RETT purposes.

Until now, it was the unanimous agreement of tax experts in literature, legislation, and courts that for RETT purposes, the civil law position and structure determines whether or not RETT is triggered in a transaction. Now the Supreme Fiscal Court has held that in cases where the law refers to indirect transfer of a property, the civil law structure is not relevant alone. In such a case, the rules stipulating economic ownership approach might be applicable.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from