Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2026

ECJ C-51/25: Clarifying The Interpretation Of Payment Services?

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The case was brought before the ECJ in the form of a preliminary ruling. The court was faced with the question of whether the business activities of the plaintiff, Betaal Garant Nederland CV (Betaal)...

GermanyFinance and Banking

A case currently before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has the potential to significantly influence the interpretation of payment services regulation in the EU. Manuel Campos Sánchez-Bordona, advocate general of the ECJ, has published an opinion in which he advocates a narrower interpretation of payment services under Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (Payment Services Directive 2—PSD2) than is currently employed in many member states, including Germany. Should the ECJ endorse this view, it would have important consequences for the scope of PSD2.

Background

The case was brought before the ECJ in the form of a preliminary ruling. The court was faced with the question of whether the business activities of the plaintiff, Betaal Garant Nederland CV (Betaal), which offers, among other services, security deposits for construction contracts, fall under the definition of payment services. For the security deposit, Betaal enters into an agreement with the client and the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from