Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2013

ECJ: Causal Link Between Professional Website And Consumer Contract Not Required

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

ECJ rules that consumers may sue the other party to a contract before their home courts under the Brussels I Regulation, even if no causal link exists between the means used to direct the commercial or professional activity to the consumers’ member state, and the conclusion of the contract.

European UnionConsumer Protection

ECJ rules that consumers may sue the other party to a contract before their home courts under the Brussels I Regulation, even if no causal link exists between the means used to direct the commercial or professional activity to the consumers' member state, and the conclusion of the contract.

This information is available in English only.

On 17 October 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") handed down its decision in case C-218/12 Lokman Emrek / Vlado Sabranovic. The decision broadens the scope of consumer protection under Art. 15 (1)(c) in connection with Art. 16 (1) Regulation 44/2001 (Brussels I Regulation).

Background

This case involved a car salesman who had a garage in France close to the German border. His website advertised a German cell phone number. Pursuant to Art. 15 (1)(c) Brussels I Regulation, jurisdiction in consumer contracts is governed by the special protective rules of Art. 16 and 17 Brussels I Regulation, whenever the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from