Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2025

Private Damages Activity Escalates Across Key Jurisdictions

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

In the EU, the surge in private damages actions following the transposition of the Private Damages Directive (PDD) at member state level has brought to the fore several novel legal questions...

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

In the EU, the surge in private damages actions following the transposition of the Private Damages Directive (PDD) at member state level has brought to the fore several novel legal questions, prompting national courts to regularly seek guidance from the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

In seeking to strike a balance between facilitating claims and promoting legal certainty, the ECJ has tended to favor the former. However, there is a concern that, if the threshold for obtaining damages in the EU is set too low, partly in response to the frequent inequality of arms between individual plaintiffs and well-funded corporate defendants, it could undermine incentives to apply for leniency, to the detriment of public enforcement. It is hoped that, as more member states introduce collective redress mechanisms, this will support a robust approach by courts to burden and standard of proof, including in relation to evidence of quantum by plaintiffs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from