Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 FEBRUARY 2025

Guidelines for AI-related invention applications (trial) released

Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Explore more from Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers

Inventor qualification/identification, for Artificial Intelligence related (AI-related) patent applications.

ChinaTechnology
Lin Zhuo
Lin Zhuo
Amanda Zhang
Amanda Zhang
Author LinkedIn connections

On December 31, 2024, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released the Guidelines for AI-related Invention Applications (Test Implementation), addressing several legal aspects, including inventor qualification/identification, for Artificial Intelligence related (AI-related) patent applications.

Below are some key highlights from the Guidelines.

Inventor qualification/Identification

The inventor(s) listed in a patent document must be a natural person or persons who have made creative contribution to the substantive features of the invention. Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, which are not currently recognised as legal entities entitled to legal rights, are not eligible to be named as inventors.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

算力中心的MaaS服务合规进阶：境内建设、跨境输出与智能体交付的法律审视

随着我国大力兴建“东数西算”工程与构建全国一体化算力网，人工智能算力中心已从传统的机柜租赁业务为核心体现的互联网数据中心（IDC）逐步演变为集算力服务、跨境技术输出与智能化工具交付于一体的复合业务载体。除了适用互联网数据中心所适用的电信业务准入、节能审查与网络安
ChinaTechnology
AnJie Broad Law Firm
AnJie Broad Law Firm
Article

Updates To Malaysia’s Proposed Patent Linkage Framework

Malaysia is drafting its first patent linkage framework for pharmaceutical products, scheduled for implementation on 1 May 2027 following CPTPP ratification. The National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency has released draft guidelines establishing an administrative connection between drug registration and patent status, introducing notification requirements, suspension periods, and four application categories that will fundamentally reshape how innovators and generic manufacturers navigate market entry.
MalaysiaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

AI Patent Consultation: What Innovators Need To Know

Singapore's Ministry of Law and IPOS have launched a public consultation examining how the patent system should adapt to AI-assisted innovation, focusing on two critical questions: what level of human contribution qualifies for inventorship when AI participates in the inventive process, and how AI-generated technical disclosures should be treated as prior art. The consultation explores scenarios from AI-assisted drug discovery and raises significant implications for businesses developing RAG systems, AI age
SingaporeIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

Australia | Proposed Tranche 2 Privacy Act Reforms: Exposure Draft And Consultation Paper Released

The Australian Government has released an exposure draft of the Privacy Amendment (Personal Data Protection) Bill 2026, proposing the most substantial reforms to the Privacy Act 1988 in recent times. These changes introduce a fair and reasonable test for data handling, enhanced consent requirements, expanded breach notification obligations, and new rights including data erasure for large digital platforms.
AustraliaPrivacy
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

Protecting The AI Systems Competitors Can Actually Copy

Businesses building AI products on third-party models face a critical intellectual property challenge: determining what parts of their AI systems can actually be protected when competitors have access to the same underlying models. This analysis explores where protectable value sits in AI workflows, from data retrieval and validation processes to system integration and deployment architecture, and why patent strategy must focus on the commercially defensible elements rather than just the AI model itself.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers