Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JUNE 2026

China+1 Supply Chain Diversification & Lenders

As tariffs reshape global manufacturing, China+1 strategies will dominate lending decisions for years to come. When manufacturers seek funding for second sites to diversify away from China, lenders face a critical question: are they backing genuine resilience or underwriting a fragile stopgap that could strain balance sheets and create nasty surprises for those committing capital?

ChinaInternational Law

Signing off on a new footprint—or underwriting a costlier set of vulnerabilities?  

As tariffs reshape global manufacturing, China+1 will loom large in lending decisions for the next couple of years. When a second site needs funding, lenders must judge whether they are backing real resilience—or a fragile stopgap. A new offshore plant, poorly thought through, can strain balance sheets and liquidity and create nasty surprises for those committing capital.

From one full plant to two half-empty 

On paper, diversifying manufacturing away from China to reduce or avoid tariff exposure addresses several issues at once, especially U.S. tariff exposure and customer concerns on geographic concentration. In reality, one fully utilized plant can easily become two partially utilized plants, and tariff savings get swallowed by lost operating leverage.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from