Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2017

Three Supreme Court Cases On Pharmaceutical Patents

S Sam Li and Honghui Hu of Wan Hui Da – Peksung IP Group explain three important Supreme Court cases on pharmaceutical patents.

ChinaIntellectual Property
S Sam Li
S Sam Li
Honghui Hu
Honghui Hu
Author LinkedIn connections

S Sam Li and Honghui Hu of Wan Hui Da – Peksung IP Group explain three important Supreme Court cases on pharmaceutical patents.

With some ten thousand cases a year, Chinese law on patent litigation is dynamic. Courts, particularly the Supreme People's Court (the Court), lead the advancement of the law. This article seeks to convey a sense of these developments through three key decisions.

The Simcere Case – amendment of patent claims

The Patent Law Article 33 limits amendments of patent claims to the original disclosure and scope of protection. The Patent Examination Guideline (the Guideline) only permits amendments if they can be directly and unambiguously determined from the original disclosure. It further limits the types of amendment to: deletion of claims, combination of claims and deletion of technical solutions within a claim. The Guideline's restrictive prescriptions and rigid applications give rise to broad dissatisfaction. From 2010, the Court has

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from