Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2008

US Insurers Have No PE In Canada

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

On May 16, 2008, the Tax Court of Canada released its judgments in American Income Life Insurance Company v. The Queen and Knights of Columbus v. The Queen.

CanadaTax

On May 16, 2008, the Tax Court of Canada released its judgments in American Income Life Insurance Company v. The Queen and Knights of Columbus v. The Queen. In both cases, the Court held that two U.S. insurers were not subject to Canadian income tax on their business profits associated with sales of insurance policies to Canadian insureds because neither of the insurers had a permanent establishment ("PE") in Canada within the meaning of the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (the "Treaty"). Under the Treaty, a resident of one treaty country is not taxable on its business profits arising in the other treaty country unless the resident has a PE in the other treaty country. If the resident does have a PE in the other treaty country, the resident is taxable on its business profits in the other treaty country only to the extent that the business profits are attributable to the PE. In both of the judgments,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from