Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2019

Case Law Summaries – Tax

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

This case involved an appeal from a Superior Court decision on the interpretation of a provision of Québec's Taxation Act.

CanadaTax

AGENCE DU REVENU DU QUÉBEC C. WESDOME GOLD MINES LTD., 2018 QCCA 518

This case involved an appeal from a Superior Court decision on the interpretation of a provision of Québec's Taxation Act.

In October 2002, the Kiena mine ceased operations and was placed in care and maintenance, because its known extractable resources did not economically justify its operations. In 2003, the Respondent Wesdome purchased the Kiena mine. Wesdome invested in the modernisation of the mine's equipment and exploration works in order to use the mine's well to explore some adjacent properties it owned. The investment paid off: through the work undertaken via the Kiena mine, Wesdome identified gold deposits that could justify extraction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from