On July 11, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) granted
leave to appeal from the Alberta Court of Appeal's decision in
Capital Steel Inc v Chandos Construction
Ltd, 2019 ABCA 32 [Chandos]. In a previous blog post, we considered the Alberta
Court of Appeal's decision with respect to the enforceability
of contract liquidated damages (LDs) upon the insolvency of one of
the contracting parties. In this blog, we address the potential
implications of Chandos with respect to the common law
principle that an LDs clause may be unenforceable if it is found to
be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of damages.
General Law on Liquidated Damages Clauses
LDs are commonly used in construction and other contracts to
pre-determine damages for specific breaches of contract. For
example, a general contractor may be required to pay LDs for each
day beyond the required completion date taken to complete the work.
In theory, by setting LDs in the contract, the innocent