Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2018

SCC Denies Leave From ONCA Decision Establishing Framework For Assumption Of Jurisdiction Over Global Classes

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

At first instance, the Superior Court of Justice granted the defendants' motion for a declaration that Ontario did not have jurisdiction over AFCs.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In November 2017, we blogged about a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Airia Brands Inc. v. Air Canada, 2017 ONCA 792, where it was held that courts in Ontario can have jurisdiction over absent foreign claimants ("AFCs"). AFCs are an opt-out class of individuals who are not present in Canada and have taken no steps to indicate their consent to a Canadian jurisdiction.

At first instance, the Superior Court of Justice granted the defendants' motion for a declaration that Ontario did not have jurisdiction over AFCs. The Court of Appeal reversed Justice Leitch's decision and created a new framework for determining when a provincial superior court can establish jurisdiction over AFCs. Writing for the court, Justice Pepall held that the Ontario Superior Court has jurisdiction over AFCs where:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from