Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JUNE 2017

Saadati V. Moorhead: The Repudiation Of A Dubious Perception Of Mental Illness

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

A unanimous decision of the Supreme Court released on June 2, 2017, filled a void in tort law when the Court stated that proof of a recognized psychiatric injury is no longer a precondition for...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A unanimous decision of the Supreme Court released on June 2, 2017, filled a void in tort law when the Court stated that proof of a recognized psychiatric injury is no longer a precondition for the award of damages for mental injuries caused by negligence. Previously, it was common for courts to dismiss a claim for compensation for a mental injury caused by negligence when a party was unable to demonstrate the existence of a recognized psychiatric injury. This is no longer a hurdle that parties must face. In Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, the Supreme Court ruled that to establish a mental injury, claimants must show evidence of a serious and prolonged disturbance that rises above ordinary annoyances, anxieties and fears.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from