Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MARCH 2012

"Richard v. Time Inc.": The "Credulous And Inexperienced" Consumer Is Reborn

On February 12, 2012, in a long-awaited ruling on Quebec consumer law, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified several questions that have been the subject of doctrinal and jurisprudential debate.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On February 12, 2012, in a long-awaited ruling on Quebec consumer law, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified several questions that have been the subject of doctrinal and jurisprudential debate. For example, the Court clearly established that:

  • Commercial advertising must be assessed from the perspective of a "credulous and inexperienced" consumer, rather than from that of a consumer with an "average level of intelligence, scepticism and curiosity".
  • That civil proceedings cannot be instituted under Section 272 of the Consumer Protection Act ("CPA"), if a person has merely seen a misleading advertisement. Rather, the person must have also entered into a consumer contract in relation to the advertisement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from