Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2017

Promoting Efficiency In International Arbitration: Changes Made By Arbitral Institutions And Rule-Making Bodies In 2016

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Delay is a common complaint of parties in international arbitration. Understandably, many parties would like to resolve their disputes efficiently and without spending an exorbitant amount of time or money.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Delay is a common complaint of parties in international arbitration. Understandably, many parties would like to resolve their disputes efficiently and without spending an exorbitant amount of time or money. On the other hand, some parties find delay to be in their best interest at certain stages of dispute resolution, which brings truth to the amusing saying "one person's delay is another person's due process."

Distinguishing efficiency and due process is important. As the highly-respected arbitrator Yves Derains recently asserted, due process must trump efficiency. The aim of international arbitration is not simply to determine a dispute as quickly and cheaply as possible. The aim of international arbitration is to arrive at a fair and reasoned decision on a dispute based on a proper evaluation of the facts, relevant agreements, and the law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from