Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2026

Inferring Materiality From Share Price Movement: Dziedziejko V Canopy Growth

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

In Dziedziejko v Canopy Growth, 2025 ONSC 6766, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that materiality can be inferred from a drop...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Dziedziejko v Canopy Growth, 2025 ONSC 6766, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that materiality can be inferred from a drop in a public issuer's share price following the correction of an admitted misstatement, justifying leave to commence a secondary market misrepresentation claim under the Ontario Securities Act.

Background: Canopy's Misstatements and Correction

The plaintiff, on behalf of investors who acquired shares in the defendant, Canopy Growth Corporation (Canopy), sought leave to proceed with a claim of secondary market misrepresentation under s.138.8 of the Ontario Securities Act and certification of a class proceeding for misrepresentation and oppression under s.5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from