Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2026

What Evidence Of Use Is Required In A Section 45 Proceeding?

The Trademarks Opposition Board's recent ruling in Therrien Couture Joli-coeur v Oldcastle Building Products clarifies the evidentiary standards trademark owners must meet when responding to section 45 notices under Canada's Trademarks Act. This decision highlights critical distinctions between evidence of actual transfers versus mere advertising, and underscores the necessity of providing specific proof for each registered good to avoid expungement.

CanadaIntellectual Property

A recent decision by the Trademarks Opposition Board (the “Board”) sheds light on the nature of the evidence a trademark owner may rely upon when the Registrar issues a notice under section 45 of the Trademarks Act.

Section 45 allows anyone to request that a trademark registration be removed (i.e., expunged) from the Register of Trademarks on the grounds that it has not been used in Canada in association with the goods or services specified in the registration at any time during the preceding three-year period. When a section 45 notice is issued, the trademark owner has three months to provide evidence of use in the form of an affidavit or statutory declaration. In the absence of use, to avoid expungement, the owner may provide evidence that the non-use was due to “special circumstances.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from