Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MAY 2022

Sedona Conference 2022: Practical Recommendations On Protecting Trade Secrets In Litigation

Fasken
Explore more from Fasken

The Sedona Conference Working Group recently issued some practical recommendations in their publication "Commentary on Protecting Trade Secrets in Litigation About Them".

CanadaIntellectual Property
Jules Arseneault (Summer Student)
Jules Arseneault (Summer Student)
Nicolas Charest
Nicolas Charest
Jason Markwell
Jason Markwell
Author LinkedIn connections

The Sedona Conference Working Group recently issued some practical recommendations in their publication "Commentary on Protecting Trade Secrets in Litigation About Them".1  The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of the guidelines developed by this group and which we recommend you consider in your current and future litigation.

In litigation before the courts, several reasons may oblige one party to disclose trade secrets to another. Methods are available to frame and limit the scope of such disclosure but without these the consequences for a company could be significant.

1. Negotiate and present to the court a protective order before disclosing any trade secrets

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Trademark Owner Who Failed To File Evidence In Expungement Proceeding Has Registration Reinstated On Appeal

Trademark owners facing expungement for failing to file evidence of use in section 45 proceedings may have recourse through the Federal Court appeal process. The recent Lion Corporation case demonstrates how administrative errors by trademark agents can be remedied, allowing registrants to file additional evidence and potentially reinstate their registrations when the failure was beyond their control.
CanadaIntellectual Property
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala
Article

Industrial Designs In Canada: Protecting Your Product’s Appearance

Foreign companies launching products in Canada often overlook industrial design registration, one of the most cost-effective forms of IP protection available. Copyright protection for product appearance is significantly restricted once a design is reproduced in quantities exceeding 50 copies, making industrial design registration the primary statutory protection for commercially manufactured products.
CanadaIntellectual Property
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

More Than Skin Deep: Ontario Considers A Makeover Of Cosmetic Injection Rules

A regulatory shift now under consideration in Ontario could reshape how the province’s medical aesthetic clinics operate. The proposal, which would change how nurses are authorized to administer medical aesthetic services, invites a broader look at how Ontario currently regulates cosmetic injections and how the proposed changes would align the province more closely with the regulatory frameworks already in place elsewhere in Canada. While these procedures are often marketed as routine “spa” services, they remain medical acts that involve prescription products and carry clinical risks.
CanadaFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Fasken
Fasken
Article

Canada’s Counter-Tariffs On US Goods: A Primer On What Canadian Businesses Need To Know

Effective September 8, 2026, Canada implemented retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods in response to the initial 50% tariffs imposed by the US under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. To operationalize these measures, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) issued Customs Notice 26-23, establishing binding administrative rules on how the surtax will be applied, calculated, and collected.
CanadaInternational Law
Fasken
Fasken
Article

Life Sciences-Health Canada Takes Action Against Unauthorized Peptide Sales

On July 29, 2026, Health Canada announced that it had obtained a permanent injunction against a Québec-based company in connection with the sale of unauthorized injectable peptides in Canada. The announcement reflects Health Canada’s continued focus on peptide products and serves as a reminder that injectable peptides intended for human use are regulated as prescription drugs and are subject to Canada's drug regulatory framework.
CanadaFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Fasken
Fasken
Article

Buying Quebec, Buying Canadian: What The New Orders In Council 1358-2026 And 1359-2026 Mean For Procurement

Under Order in Council 1358-2026, the Québec government authorizes, from September 7, 2026 to January 31, 2027, the Centre d'acquisitions gouvernementales (the “CAG”) to depart from the general principle that public calls for tenders must be open and without discrimination to foreign suppliers from jurisdictions bound by an intergovernmental agreement with Québec.
CanadaGovernment, Public Sector
Fasken
Fasken
Article

Open Banking Milestone: Draft Supervisory Guidelines For Consumer-Driven Banking Released

The Bank of Canada (the “Bank”) has published two proposed guidelines relating to the accreditation process for prospective participants under the Consumer-Driven Banking Framework: the Participating entity accreditation application requirements under the Consumer-Driven Banking Act (the “Participating Entity Guideline”) and the Third-party service provider accreditation application requirements under the Consumer-Driven Banking Act (the “TPSP Guideline”).
CanadaFinance and Banking
Fasken
Fasken