Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2015

Security On Inventory Subject To Third-Party Intellectual Property Rights: How Are Creditors’ Rights Affected?

The general principle is that security granted on tangible property also charges the property’s accessories.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The general principle is that security granted on tangible property also charges the property's accessories. That is not the case however when intellectual property ("IP") rights belonging to a third party attach to inventory1. For such rights are not considered to be accessories and thus are not charged by the security, unless the holder of the IP rights has otherwise agreed. 

If the grantor of the security goes bankrupt, enforcement of the creditor's security could thus be compromised because of the third-party IP rights.  

Patents 

Close attention must be paid to the contract between the grantor of the security and the holder of the IP rights, as it may contain significant restrictions on assignability and the enforceability of security on patented merchandise and equipment. The enforcement of a hypothec on patented merchandise could be compromised or contested, notwithstanding the provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from