Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2025

Patented Medicine Prices Review Board "Crashed Through The Constitutional, Statutory And Jurisprudential Guardrails"

The Federal Court of Appeal issued strong reasons reprimanding the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board for overstepping its jurisdiction.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The Federal Court of Appeal issued strong reasons reprimanding the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board for overstepping its jurisdiction. The Court found "the Board crashed through the constitutional, statutory and jurisprudential guardrails. Or to use the more orthodox, formal, administrative law language [...] the Board exceeded the constraints acting upon it."

The Board regulates the pricing of medicines that are under the market power given by a patent. It does not regulate unpatented medicines.

Galderma's product, Differin, was a patented medicine until the patent expired in 2009. In 2016, the Board ordered Galderma to produce pricing information for periods after Differin became unpatented. The Board considered that Differin remained a patented medicine on the basis that there remained a patent (the 237 Patent) relating to Differin XP, a separate medicine with a higher concentration of the same active ingredient. The Federal Court found the Board's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from