Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MARCH 2012

Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin - Week Of March 5, 2012

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The present motion relates to security for costs in the context of an action for passing off and for infringement of two industrial designs. The Prothonotary had ordered the Plaintiffs to pay security for costs in the amount of $55,000 and the Defendants appealed that order.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Edited by Chantal Saunders and Beverley Moore

OTHER CASES OF INTEREST

Security for Costs Must Take into Account Offers to Settle
Bodum USA, Inc v. Trudeau Corporation (1889) Inc.

The present motion relates to security for costs in the context of an action for passing off and for infringement of two industrial designs. The Prothonotary had ordered the Plaintiffs to pay security for costs in the amount of $55,000 and the Defendants appealed that order.

The Motions Judge granted the appeal, holding that the Prothonotary had erred in concluding that Rule 420(2) of the Federal Court Rules regarding taxable steps taken after a written offer to settle, was not applicable. The Court held that the Defendants had indeed made an offer to settle that met all of the requirements of the rule and that the rule should be taken into account when considering the amount of security for costs. Thus the Court required the Plaintiffs to deposit an additional $20,000 as the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from