Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2011

Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Alert - (Week Of May 23, 2011)

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Federal Court granted prohibition to Pfizer in respect of Mylan's Notice of Allegation (NOA) that the patent for the drug in question was invalid.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Edited by Chantal Saunders and Beverley Moore

NOC Proceedings

Prohibition Granted re: Compound Patent
Pfizer v. Mylan
Drug: donepezil

The Federal Court granted prohibition to Pfizer in respect of Mylan's Notice of Allegation (NOA) that the patent for the drug in question was invalid. The claims at issue related to the chemical compound and a therapeutic composition for treating senile dementia comprising the chemical compound. Mylan challenged the patent on grounds of utility, promise and a lack of sound prediction and these allegations were found to be not justified.

In its Memorandum of Fact and Law, Mylan also alleged that some of the testing and data as repeated in the patent was inaccurate. The Court found that the evidence as to what took place at Eisai was very difficult to follow, however, it need not be considered in the context of this proceeding as it was not an allegation made by Mylan in its NOA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from