Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2012

Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Alert - Week Of March 26, 2012

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has granted Apotex’ appeal and sent a case considering s. 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations) back to the Trial Judge for redetermination.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Edited by Chantal Saunders and Beverley Moore

Actions

The Court of Appeal sends s.8 case back to Trial Judge for redetermination

Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Frosst Canada Co. et al

Drug: lovastatin

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) has granted Apotex' appeal and sent a case considering s. 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the Regulations) back to the Trial Judge for redetermination. The Trial decision can be found here and our summary of it can be found here.

The FCA considered the chronology of events and held that despite Apotex having been granted an NOC prior to the 1998 amendments to the Regulations, Merck's appeal of the prohibition proceeding was still pending before the Court. The FCA did not dismiss Merck's appeal until 1999. Thus, the 1998 Regulations and not the 1993 Regulations were applicable to Apotex' s. 8 claim. The FCA held that even though the issue of the NOC rendered the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from