Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 SEPTEMBER 2011

Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Alert - Week Of August 29, 2011

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

This is an appeal from an Order of a Prothonotary, allowing the Plaintiffs’ motion to amend its Second Amended Statement of Claim. Specifically, the Prothonotary allowed pleas to be added with respect to a prior United States proceeding and an additional plea regarding a prior Canadian decision.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Edited by Chantal Saunders and Beverley Moore

ACTIONS

Amendments Relating to Prior US and Canadian Proceedings Allowed in Statement of Claim

Astrazeneca Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
Drug: omeprazole

This is an appeal from an Order of a Prothonotary, allowing the Plaintiffs' motion to amend its Second Amended Statement of Claim. Specifically, the Prothonotary allowed pleas to be added with respect to a prior United States proceeding and an additional plea regarding a prior Canadian decision. The Court reviewed the decision of the Prothonotary and commented on the deference to be shown to a Case Management Prothonotary. The Court found that the Prothonotary's decision should not be interfered with unless it was clearly wrong, as the question in the motion was not vital to the final issue of the case. The Court concluded that the decision was not clearly wrong. In any event, even if considering the issue de novo, the Court would have allowed the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from