Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2023

The Safe Third Country Agreement: Safe… For Now?

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In Canadian Council for Refugees v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 SCC 17, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) unanimously confirmed that the designation of the United States...

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

In Canadian Council for Refugees v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 SCC 17, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) unanimously1 confirmed that the designation of the United States as a safe third country for the purpose of refugee claims does not violate section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedomswhile remitting the claimants' undecided section 15 challenge to the Federal Court. The SCC also provides helpful clarification on how courts should conduct the section 7 analysis and on the proper appellate review of constitutional claims not decided at first instance.

I. Background

The United States and Canada share a bilateral treaty – the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA). Under the STCA, refugee claimants are required to seek refugee protection in whichever of the United States or Canada they first enter after departing their country of origin. This treaty is designed to allow both countries to share the responsibility of refugee claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from