Relying on limitations and laches, the Governments of Alberta
and Canada (Crowns) applied for summary
dismissal1 of a 2003 action commenced by the Stoney
Nakoda First Nations (collectively) and the Stoney Indian Band or
tribe (collectively, the Stoney) against the Crowns, wherein the
Stoney sought a wide range of remedial relief as well as a
declaration of Aboriginal title and rights to land in southern
Alberta.
In granting partial summary judgment, the Court
in Wesley2 referenced the Supreme
Court of Canada's decisions in Manitoba
Métis,3 Wewaykum,4 and
Lameman,5 and confirmed that
Aboriginal claims are subject to provincial limitations legislation
even where rights at stake are constitutionally protected, unless
there is a claim for declaratory relief.