Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2022

ABKB Decision Confirms That Constitutionally Protected Aboriginal Rights Are Captured By Limitation Defences

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

Relying on limitations and laches, the Governments of Alberta and Canada (Crowns) applied for summary dismissal of a 2003 action commenced by the Stoney Nakoda First Nations (collectively)...

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

Relying on limitations and laches, the Governments of Alberta and Canada (Crowns) applied for summary dismissal1 of a 2003 action commenced by the Stoney Nakoda First Nations (collectively) and the Stoney Indian Band or tribe (collectively, the Stoney) against the Crowns, wherein the Stoney sought a wide range of remedial relief as well as a declaration of Aboriginal title and rights to land in southern Alberta.

In granting partial summary judgment, the Court in Wesley2  referenced the Supreme Court of Canada's decisions in Manitoba Métis,3 Wewaykum,4 and  Lameman,5 and confirmed that Aboriginal claims are subject to provincial limitations legislation even where rights at stake are constitutionally protected, unless there is a claim for declaratory relief.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from