Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 SEPTEMBER 2016

Why We Don't Have Twenty-Five Year Mortgages In Canada

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

Partner Michael Feldman and Associate Sharon Au have co-authored "Why We Don't Have Twenty-Five Year Mortgages in Canada," an article for the August issue of the National Banking Law Review.

CanadaFinance and Banking

Partner and Banking and Debt Finance expert Michael Feldman and Associate Sharon Au have co-authored "Why We Don't Have Twenty-Five Year Mortgages in Canada," an article for the August issue of the National Banking Law Review. Michael and Sharon discuss the common commercial practice in the Canadian mortgage market of offering five-year mortgages and how the prevalence of this practice affects the development of a market for Residential Mortgage Backed Securities. Below is an excerpt of the article.

A young couple have found the house of their dreams and start looking for a mortgage that they can pay off over 25 years. Every mortgage lender they talk to is willing to offer them a mortgage with a payment schedule that amortizes over 25 years, but none of them are willing to offer a mortgage that fully matures in 25 years. In fact, very few of them are willing to offer a mortgage that matures more than five years from the mortgage date. Why can't this couple find

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from