Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2007

Proposed Replacement Of Instrument Relating To Internal Control Reporting And Certification Requirements

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On March 30, 2007, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published for comment a replacement of Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (MI 52-109).

CanadaFinance and Banking

Article by Eric Moncik and Lindsay Bunt, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Securities Law, April 2007

On March 30, 2007, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published for comment a replacement of Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (MI 52-109). If enacted, proposed National Instrument 52- 109 (Proposed NI 52-109) would require management to evaluate an issuer’s internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) and provide management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) disclosure about their conclusions on the effectiveness of ICFR based on such evaluation.

The CSA members (other than British Columbia) had previously published for comment, on February 4, 2005, Multilateral Instrument 52-111 Reporting on Internal Control Over Financial Planning and an amended and restated Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (2005

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from