Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2017

Pensions Newsletter – July 2017

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Welcome to the 18th issue of the Blakes Pensions Newsletter. This newsletter provides a summary of recent jurisprudential developments that affect pensions and benefits and is not intended to be legal advice.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Welcome to the 18th issue of the Blakes Pensions Newsletter. This newsletter provides a summary of recent jurisprudential developments that affect pensions and benefits and is not intended to be legal advice.

FAMILY LAW

Melis v. Zwanenburg, 2017 ONSC 613

Caroline Melis (the wife) and Cornelis Johannes Zwanenburg (the husband) married in 1986 and separated in 2004. Pursuant to the subsequent divorce order, the wife was required to pay C$3,200 per month in spousal support. As part of the equalization process, the wife also paid to the husband C$217,244, plus interest, from her federal pension. The wife brought a motion to terminate or reduce the spousal support payments since the reduction in her income following her retirement constituted a "material change in circumstances" according to the divorce order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from