Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2015

Ontario Superior Court Takes "Trust" Approach To Mitigation At Summary Judgment

Summary judgment has increasingly become a process used to litigate wrongful dismissal actions.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Summary judgment has increasingly become a process used to litigate wrongful dismissal actions. It can be attractive as it allows the parties to avoid going through a more costly and time-consuming trial. However, the efficiency of this process raises other issues. Because parties can bring a summary judgment motion early on in the proceedings, a decision may be rendered prior to the expiry of the reasonable notice period at common law. This raises the question as to how to deal with the issue of mitigation.

A recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court, Paquette v. TeraGo Network Inc., addresses this issue. The case was heard on a summary judgment motion. The plaintiff, Mr. Paquette, was dismissed from his employment without cause on November 25, 2014, after approximately 14 years of service. The motion judge found that the reasonable notice period at common law was 17 months.  The motion judge also determined that the plaintiff had made reasonable efforts to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from