Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2013

Ontario Court Rules On Reducing Retiree Benefits

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Although the Ontario Superior Court ruled against General Motors of Canada Limited in O'Neill v. General Motors of Canada, the decision provides additional guidance for employers on how to properly reserve the right to change benefits for retired employees.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Although the Ontario Superior Court ruled against General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) in O'Neill v. General Motors of Canada, the decision provides additional guidance for employers on how to properly reserve the right to change benefits for retired employees.

Background

On July 17, 2013, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found that GMCL was not permitted to reduce the retirement health care and life insurance benefits for 3,297 salaried employees and surviving spouses who retired after January 1, 1995 but before October 20, 2011. The Court did find that GMCL was permitted to reduce the retiree benefits for 67 executive employees. It has been reported that GMCL intends to appeal the decision.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from