Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JUNE 2016

Less Than Perfect Termination Clause Upheld

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

As employers have discovered in recent years, although termination clauses are a best practice, former employees will do whatever they can to set them aside following termination.

CanadaEmployment and HR

As employers have discovered in recent years, although termination clauses are a best practice, former employees will do whatever they can to set them aside following termination.  In many cases, courts have set termination clauses aside, despite the apparent intent of the parties, where they are not drafted perfectly.  A recent case, Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltd., 2016 ONSC 1412 suggests that the very high standard imposed on employers may have lessened somewhat.  

The termination clause at issue provided that the employer was entitled to terminate the employee's employment "at any time without cause by providing ... two weeks Notice of Termination or pay in lieu thereof for each completed or partial year of employment with the company".  The termination clause also provided that "payments and notice provided for in this paragraph are inclusive of your entitlements to notice, pay in lieu of notice and severance pay pursuant to the Employment Standards Act, 2000".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from