Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2015

Employment Update: Termination Provisions And The Definition Of Severance

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice's decision in Paquette v. Quadraspec Inc. addresses two important issues that employers face:

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice's decision in Paquette v. Quadraspec Inc. addresses two important issues that employers face: (1) how to properly draft an employment agreement in accordance with the notice provisions in Ontario's employment standards legislation (the Employment Standards Act, 2000, ("ESA")); and (2) whether an employee is entitled to severance pay in addition to termination pay upon termination under the ESA.

The interpretation of the wording of termination provisions in employment agreements is not a novel issue. The Supreme Court of Canada and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice have both previously held that employment agreements that do not provide the minimum notice requirements under the ESA are null and void and therefore entitle the employee to common law notice (see the Supreme Court of Canada's 1992 decision in Machtinger v. HOJ Industries and the more recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decisions in Stevens v. Sifton

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from