Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JANUARY 2015

Don't Let A Restrictive Covenant Bite You In The Assets

The challenges of enforcing non-competition and non-solicitation clauses in employment contracts are well known.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The challenges of enforcing non-competition and non-solicitation clauses in employment contracts are well known.  It is less renowned that such clauses may increase the reasonable notice period owed by an employer to a dismissed employee, as we were reminded in a recent decision by the Supreme Court of British Columbia:  Ostrow v Abacus Management Corporation Mergers and Acquisitions.  

The defendant, a private equity company, employed Mr. Ostrow as a senior manager to provide tax advice. There was a termination clause in his employment contract that allowed for "reasonable notice according to the law or pay in lieu of notice in accordance with the law". The contract also included a six month non-competition clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from