This article was prepared with the assistance of summer law
student Amy Fisher.
Contractors are generally viewed and treated as distinct
entities from the engaging party, with independent contractors
operating outside the structure, control and obligations that
typically apply to employees. Unlike employees, contractors are
presumed to run their own business, control their work and bear the
associated risks and rewards.
In practice, however, the classification of work relationships
is not strictly binary. Instead, it exists on a spectrum ranging
from pure employment, to dependent contractors and finally to
independent contractors. The recent British Columbia Supreme Court
(BCSC) decision in Ursic v. Country Lumber Ltd, 2025 BCSC
970, affirms this spectrum and highlights the differences and
overlaps between dependent contractors and employees, as well as
the potential obligations that arise when a contractor's role
becomes highly dependent.