Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2014

Compliance With AODA Does Not Necessarily Insulate Employers From Human Rights Liability

Many employers have raised questions of whether compliance with AODA also satisfies its duty to accommodate employees to the point of undue hardship.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Since the adoption of the Accessibility of Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 ("AODA"), many employers have raised questions of whether compliance with AODA also satisfies its duty to accommodate employees to the point of undue hardship under the Human Rights Code ("Code").   The short answer to this question is "No".   While the Human Rights Tribunal ("Tribunal") has determined that it does not oversee compliance with AODA, the Human Rights Commission has confirmed on its website that AODA does not supplant the Code, and compliance with one does not necessarily mean compliance with the other.

Four recent decisions from the Tribunal have confirmed that employers and service-providers who fail to accommodate the needs of its customers and employers will still be subject to human rights liability if they fail to accommodate the accessibility needs of persons with a disability to the point of undue hardship.   In the cases outlined below, service-providers and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from