Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 FEBRUARY 2025

A Cautionary Tale: Refusing To Payout Contractual Entitlements Without A Release Could Repudiate The Entire Employment Agreement

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

In a recent Ontario decision, Timmins v. Artisan Cells, the Court reviewed circumstances often faced by employers considering termination of employment: the employment contract provided for three months...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In a recent Ontario decision, Timmins v. Artisan Cells, the Court reviewed circumstances often faced by employers considering termination of employment: the employment contract provided for three months' notice/pay in lieu on termination without cause; however, the agreement did not require the employee to sign a release.

The employee in this case held a senior level role and was terminated without cause. The employer offered one week of termination pay (which it claimed was pursuant to the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the ESA)) and required a broad release to provide the balance of the three months' pay owed under the employment contract. Notably, with 3.5 years of completed service, the employee was actually entitled to three weeks of termination pay under the ESA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from