Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 NOVEMBER 2016

SEC Proposed Rule On Universal Proxies

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

It has long been the view that a shareholder's ability to elect directors is a fundamental right under corporate law.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

It has long been the view that a shareholder's ability to elect directors is a fundamental right under corporate law. Few shareholders attend meetings in person, and therefore the instrument used to exercise that right has been the proxy. However, due to a combination of U.S. federal and state law requirements, the current U.S. proxy regime has been unable to replicate the options available to shareholders voting at a meeting. This has been particularly evident in the case of proxy contests, where shareholders are often left with the option of voting for either the company's director nominees or the dissident's director nominees, but not a combination.    

On October 26, 2016, by a 2-1 vote among Commissioners, the SEC proposed a rule to fundamentally change the nature of proxy contests. If approved, instead of voting for directors on one slate or the other, shareholders voting by proxy could choose a combination of management and dissident nominees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from