Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JANUARY 2015

No Hiding Behind Business Judgment Rule For Executive Compensation Matters

Expert evidence and market data can support a board’s decision.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision serves as an important reminder that when the board of directors makes decisions on executive compensation matters, their conclusions must be evidence-based and properly documented in order to discharge their fiduciary duties.

In Unique Broadband Systems, Inc. (Re), 2014 ONCA 538, the Court of Appeal affirmed the nature of directors' and officers' fiduciary duties and clarified the application of the business judgment rule in the context of a dispute regarding executive compensation. The case is significant from a corporate governance perspective for several reasons, including because of the following findings:

1. Expert evidence and market data can support a board's decision. The Court of Appeal specifically noted that "The UBS Board did not seek or receive any expert advice on an appropriate bonus structure. Nor did they have any comparable or other data regarding executive compensation in the marketplace."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from