Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2015

Merger Review In Canada

In order to determine whether competition is likely to be prevented substantially by a merger, a forward-looking analysis is required of the "but for" landscape that would probably exist without the merger.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Merger review in Canada

The Supreme Court has clarified merger review analysis

On 22 January 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its first decision in nearly 20 years regarding the Competition Act's merger provisions. Its decision in Tervita Corp v Canada (Commissioner of Competition) is important because (1) it sets out the proper analytical framework for determining whether a transaction substantially prevents competition, as opposed to substantially lessens competition; and (2) it clarifies the application of Canada's statutory "efficiencies defence" to otherwise anticompetitive mergers.

Background

Tervita, a waste-management services company in Western Canada, owned and operated the only two secure landfills for oil and gas hazardous waste in northeastern British Columbia when it acquired Complete Environmental in January 2011. A subsidiary of Complete Environmental owned the Babkirk site and a permit to operate a secure landfill for oil and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from