Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2014

CSA Provides "Guidance" Not Rules To Regulate Proxy Advisory Firms

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

As shareholder activism continues to rise in Canada, the role and influence of proxy advisory firms has become increasingly important.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Overview

As shareholder activism continues to rise in Canada, the role and influence of proxy advisory firms, particularly Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis & Co., has become increasingly important. To address concerns raised by market participants, the CSA published Consultation Paper 25-401 Potential Regulation of Proxy Advisory Firms on June 21, 2012. Based on the over 60 comments received, the CSA announced on September 19, 2013, that it would develop a policy based approach to regulate such firms.

On April 24, 2014, the CSA published for 60-  day comment proposed National Policy 25-201 Guidance for Proxy Advisory Firms (the Proposed Policy) to address the regulation of proxy advisory firms — a copy of the report can be accessed  here1. For the most part, the Proposed Policy merely provides guidance in the form of suggestions that proxy firms "may consider" rather than rules that must be followed, and as such, may not be the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from