Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2013

At The Crossroads: Where Does Canada Go With Defensive Tactics?

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

Defensive tactics employed by boards of target companies in response to unsolicited take-over bids have once again become the topic of mainstream discussion.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Defensive tactics employed by boards of target companies in response to unsolicited ("hostile") take-over bids have once again become the topic of mainstream discussion.  Significant merger and acquisition activity, a number of conflicting regulatory decisions and a growing dissatisfaction in recent years with the inflexibility of the securities regulatory approach to shareholders rights plans have driven this discussion.

The members of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) have joined the discussion by publishing  for comment a number of proposals to amend their approach to the most popular defensive tactic, the shareholder rights plan (a Rights Plan, a.k.a. a "poison pill"). However, there is no agreement amongst Canadian regulators about how to reform the regulatory approach to this defensive tactic.  Although Québec's Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) participated in the publication of the CSA's proposed National Instrument 62-105 Security Holder

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from