Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2026

Just And Equitable Liquidation And Dissolution: A Remedy For Shareholder Disputes

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Shareholder disputes can paralyze decision-making and impair governance in closely held companies. British Columbia courts offer a powerful alternative to the oppression remedy: the "just and equitable" liquidation and dissolution remedy under section 324 of the Business Corporations Act, which provides a lower threshold for relief in cases of deadlock, loss of substratum, and breakdown of trust.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Shareholder disputes can destabilize a company. They often paralyze the decision-making process and impair governance. When shareholder disputes arise, the courts are often asked to intervene. While many parties turn to the oppression remedy under s. 227 of the Business Corporations Act (BCA), which was discussed in our December 2024 article on the oppression remedy, British Columbia courts have another powerful tool at their disposal: the “just and equitable” liquidation and dissolution remedy under section 324 of the BCA. This remedy plays a central role in resolving shareholder deadlock, loss of substratum, and breakdowns in closely held companies.

The just and equitable test: a lower threshold

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from