Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2014

Use It Or...... Else: Patent Non-Use As Abuse Of Dominant Market Position

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In a matter of a first impression under the Canadian Competition Act, on May 13, 2014 the Competition Bureau released a Position Statement1 regarding what it refers to as "product hopping" or "product switching".

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

In a matter of a first impression under the Canadian Competition Act, on May 13, 2014 the Competition Bureau released a Position Statement1 regarding what it refers to as "product hopping" or "product switching". That is conduct designed to switch demand from one of a firm's patent protected products to another, with the goal of making generic entry more difficult. This is the first time that the Bureau has conducted a formal inquiry into product hopping, although the conduct has been subject to US and European competition scrutiny.2 In the particular Canadian case, however, the Bureau closed its inquiry under the abuse of dominant market position provisions of the Act without taking action, because it found that the product had only been withdrawn from the market for a limited period of time, such that no injury occurred.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from