Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2015

The Competition Bureau’s Interest In Patent Litigation Settlement

The Competition Bureau published a white paper in Fall 2014 discussing how it intends to consider patent litigation settlements in the future.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

The Competition Bureau published a white paper in Fall 2014 discussing how it intends to consider patent litigation settlements in the future, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector. Entitled Patent Litigation Settlement Agreements: A Canadian Perspective,1 the white paper canvasses a variety of competition law issues that have arisen, notably, in the United States in the context of patent settlements, and discusses how the Competition Bureau may react to similar developments in Canada.

Generally, the United States Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") has taken the position that American antitrust laws are not violated by settlement agreements that merely set a date for a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer's market entry. Pay-for-delay agreements (where a brand pharmaceutical company pays the generic pharmaceutical company to delay market entry), on the other hand, can align the interests of brand and generic competitors, and can be seen to violate U.S. antitrust

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from