Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2018

Court Refuses To Certify Canadian Price-Fixing Case

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

For many years, it was next to impossible to certify a price-fixing class action in Canada. Today, certification is so common that refusals to certify are the rare exception.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

For many years, it was next to impossible to certify a price-fixing class action in Canada. Today, certification is so common that refusals to certify are the rare exception. Ewert v Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, 2017 BCSC 2357 [Ewert], is such an exception. While the threshold for certification in Canada is low, the court emphasized that certification was not a "'file, smile and certify' exercise." It refused to certify the case owing to the plaintiff's failure to demonstrate the availability of key data inputs for its econometric methodology.

The plaintiff's allegations in Ewert followed a typical pattern for price-fixing cases. The defendants operated roll-on/roll-off vessels used to transport vehicles and heavy equipment to Canada. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants had fixed shipping prices, resulting in higher costs for the Canadian class members who purchased the imported vehicles. Several defendants had pleaded guilty to price-fixing charges in the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from