Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JUNE 2016

Competition Tribunal Rescinds Ebooks Consent Agreement, Clarifies Substantive Requirements

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

On June 10, 2016, the Tribunal released a decision in Rakuten Kobo Inc. v. The Commissioner of Competition, revoking a 2014 consent agreement between the Commissioner of Competition and four ebook publishers.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • The Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) requires that consent agreements disclose the basis of the conduct being remedied and the remedy's rationale.
  • The Tribunal confirms a previous holding that mere allegations of unlawful conduct are insufficient. The Commissioner must conclude that conduct contravenes the Competition Act.
  • The decision will mean greater transparency from the settlement process.

On June 10, 2016, the Tribunal released a decision in Rakuten Kobo Inc. v. The Commissioner of Competition (Kobo), revoking a 2014 consent agreement between the Commissioner of Competition (Commissioner) and four ebook publishers (Respondent Publishers).

Following the 2014 consent agreement between the Commissioner and the Respondent Publishers, Rakuten Kobo Inc., a third-party retailer of e-books, applied to the Tribunal to change or rescind the agreement on grounds that it was based on terms that cannot be the subject of an order of the Tribunal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from